To deal with your last point first, I have stated that Prof. McKeagney has to justify his funding, just as you do. In my opinion most of his results have been entirely predictable, though not unhelpful. I have strong links with the Medical Faculty at Glasgow University, and have no reason to suspect that the Prof. would act other than ethically. I note that you agree with me that Castle Craig is able to produce unaudited selective reports. I did not say they are deliberately misleading, but I question their statistical value. That 'others' look on them favourably is not surprising, when they have nowhere else to offload their problems, though I have never disputed that Castle Craig does help many. What annoys me is that you consistently 'blow your own trumpet', and project your business as though it is some massive charity, which it clearly is not. Incidentally, who are those 'statutary' patients whom you claim to treat at a loss?